function set_Cookie()
    {
        document.cookie = "myurl=" + document.location.href + ";path=/";
    }

    set_Cookie();

        
document.write("<a href=\"javascript: startPop('/pls/cms/article_comments.add_comment?p_dopop=Y&p_content_id=53706');\"><img src=/pics/addcomment.gif border=0></a></div></div>");
document.write("<div class=\"article_Comments\">USER COMMENTS >");
document.write("<h5>What a joke</h5>");
document.write(". Lepper_Messiah");
document.write("<h5>Tea</h5>");
document.write("Yep, was as sober as a judge. He was drinking tea all day ....... Fred");
document.write("<h5>Typical SA</h5>");
document.write("Blatant criminality by ANC officials/stooges is over-looked once again. If he was 0,2g after three hours then he surely would have tested HIGHER afer two hours? We actually don't even care anymore, he will get away scott free, besides - we have more serious offenders in higher positions to worry about.<br />. Tracy");
document.write("<h5>Typical SA</h5>");
document.write("Blatant criminality by ANC officials/stooges is over-looked once again. If he was 0,2g after three hours then he surely would have tested HIGHER afer two hours? We actually don't even care anymore, he will get away scott free, besides - we have more serious offenders in higher positions to worry about.<br />. Tracy");
document.write("<h5>Forensics Science & Forensics Scientist</h5>");
document.write("As an independent forensic scientist I have followed (in the media) the case of Judge Motata with great interest.  I believe that the general public must appreciate that science and the courts both rely on verifiable facts, not conjecture.  Therefore - if the State chooses to prosecute Judge Motata using scientific evidence, then the State must (beyond reasonable doubt) proof that the science relied upon is valid and applicable to the case at hand.  Failing to do so leaves the Court with no other option but to disregard such evidence.  In the end it is not about what we think or believe or feel, it is about what can be substantiated beyond reasonable doubt. Our adversarial legal system allows for the forensic evidence and the opinions of forensic experts to be tested, just a pity that as a rule only the wealthy (like Judge Motata) can afford to challenge the State's forensic evidence.  It more or less comes down to a fair trial for those who can afford it, as for the rest....    . Etienne van Zyl");
document.write("<h5>The Law does not see the truth, only evidence... </h5>");
document.write("This is what I was told by a state prosecutor after the case against the drunk man who crashed into my car.  His blood was taken 2 hours and 10 minutes after the breathaliser and therefore the results were invalid...  <br /><br />That he was VERY drunk at the time of the accident was evident.  That he had VERY deep pockets for the policemen who arrested him was even more evident... <br /><br />Seems to me that the Law is very accomodating to the right people! . ");
document.write("</div>");