The Speaker of the National Assembly, Max Sisulu, has found DA
MP David Maynier did not break any parliamentary rules by
disclosing classified information on arms deals.
Sisulu qualified his decision however, by saying the case may
have pointed to a gap in the rules, a point the Democratic Alliance
on Monday said was "deeply problematic" as this could hint at a
move to discourage MPs from asking tough questions.
The Speaker communicated his findings in a letter to Nyami Booi,
the chairman of Parliament's portfolio committee on defence, dated
September 24 ? three weeks after the ANC urged Sisulu to expel
Maynier from the committee.
"There is no basis for me to take action against the member,"
Sisulu stated.
He added however that the case had identified a possible gap in
the rules governing MPs' conduct and said he would "refer the
matter to the National Assembly Rules Committee to develop the
necessary rules".
Sisulu also said that it did appear as though Maynier may have
contravened the National Conventional Arms Control Act by making
known information about pending weapons sales.
He said the matter should therefore be referred to the National
Conventional Arms Control Committee (NCACC) to decide whether it
wanted to lay charges with the police or the National Prosecuting
Authority (NPA).
Maynier has led a campaign to force the NCACC to disclose
details of what he calls "ten dodgy arms deals" with nations like
Libya, Syria, Venezuela and Zimbabwe.
He also claimed a South African weapons company may have been
guilty of "sanctions-busting" by trying to import aviator G-suits
made in a third country and passing these on to Iran in violations
of an arms embargo.
He has repeatedly refused to reveal his sources.
ANC members of the defence committee accused him of making
public secret, stolen information and called for his removal.
The state law advisor and Parliament's law advisor were divided
on the matter.
The latter said since Maynier initially revealed the information
at a press conference and not in Parliament, he was not covered by
parliamentary privilege and had broken the law.
But the state law advisor disagreed, saying it was unclear. He
said an investigation was needed to determine whether Maynier had
fallen foul of the rules of the legislature or the National
Conventional Arms Control Act.
The DA said on Monday said Sisulu was misguided in referring the
matter to the NCACC.
"The Speaker... is acting to blur the separation of power that
should exist between the executive and the legislature. If the
NCACC wants to pursue charges, that option was open to it from day
one, it does not need a recommendation from the legislature to do
so."
DA chief whip Ian Davidson said if the NCACC were to act now
"the impression would be created that the law prevented the Speaker
from acting and he has simply outsourced this issue to the
executive, in the form of the NCACC, which is a Cabinet committee."
He added that it appeared Sisulu wanted to write new
parliamentary rules that would "criminalise" attempts by MPs to
hold the executive to account "by asking hard questions".
Davidson said he would take the matter up with Sisulu.