President Robert Mugabe called for the lifting of "illegally imposed sanctions" on his
regime.
TAC hails victory over Rath
Article By:
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:31
The Cape High Court ruling that vitamin entrepreneur Matthias Rath
was acting illegally was a victory for the rule of law and for science
in medicine, the Treatment Action Campaign said on Friday.
In a ruling handed down on Friday morning, judge Dumasini Zondi
barred Rath from claiming his product VitaCell was a treatment for
Aids, and declared that the clinical trials he has been conducting in
black townships were unlawful.
Zondi also said Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang and her
department had a duty to investigate Rath's activities.
"This judgment this morning is a victory for the rule of law and
the scientific governance of medicine," TAC spokesperson Nathan Geffen
told journalists at a media briefing soon afterwards.
"Over the last decade in this country that rule of law has been
contested by our minister of health and the president, and a culture of
impunity has been created such that charlatans like Matthias Rath can
get away
with deceiving vulnerable people into taking snake oils such
that those people end up progressing to Aids and dying."
Geffen said the TAC was aware of at least 12 people who had died of
Aids after going to Rath's clinics and not seeking appropriate
treatment at public health clinics.
"So although this is a great victory today let's not forget that
there were real human lives lost as a consequence of the actions of
Matthias Rath and more importantly by the failure of Manto
Tshabalala-Msimang and the president to stop this sort of quackery."
Geffen said there were quacks and charlatans everywhere in the
world.
What made South Africa different was that here they had political
support of the health minister and ultimately the president, Thabo
Mbeki.
It was this that allowed them to act with impunity and be so
pervasive.
In his ruling, judge Zondi declared that the clinical trials
conducted in South Africa by or under the direction
of Rath and his Dr
Rath Foundation were "unlawful", and interdicted them from conducting
any further trials.
He also ordered that Rath not publish advertisements touting the
supposed anti-aids benefits of his VitaCell, until he had submitted the
product to the Medicines Control Council.
Zondi said the minister and her director general - who both opposed
the TAC court application — had a duty to take "reasonable measures"
to prevent Rath from conducting trials and from advertising VitaCell.
The judge said they should investigate the trials that have taken
place, and the VitaCell ads, "and in the light of the facts revealed by
such investigation, to take further reasonable action in accordance
with their duty".
Zondi ordered Rath and the foundation to pay 90 percent of the TAC's
costs, and the minister and the DG to pay the rest.